Election Interference Evaluation

Team info
DescriptionSince 2015 US election and 2016 Brexit referendum upsets, foreign relation to democratic elections has changed into a hot topic. On John Oliver’s Last Week Tonight, a segment explained the simplicity tampering with voting machines which inspired me to write down this short article. Before I recieve into how basic and inexpensive it really is to propagate disinformation on the net, I’d like provide some background on why and the way more nations will probably be entering the digital warfare space inside the future.
Foundations of Geopolitics, a novel drafted from the International Department from the Russian Secretary of state for Defence back in 1997, led the way being a philosophical instructions manual for dismantling and dethroning enemies and super-powers alike, with all the ultimate aim of “Finlandization” its Europe. In accordance with Wikipedia’s summary on the strategy:
“Military operations play relatively little role. The textbook advocates a sophisticated program of subversion, destabilization, and disinformation spearheaded with the Russia special services.”
In the 2015 US election with a meagre monthly budget of only $1.25M (estimated $15M a year), Russia’s Research Agency could deliver the US election on the Republican Party. Regarding return-on-investment (ROI), Russia spends $36M per Mi-35 helicopter. It is no surprise then, that as Russia gains more territory and influence, its actual military expenses are decreasing.
Military power is clearly a really costly ongoing expense where destabilization is comparatively cheap and plentiful. But exactly how is done?
Tactic 1: Get the Fractures Then Divide & Conquer
With all the example of america, this fracturing tactic was exquisitely executed by fuelling instability and actively supporting all dissident groups simultaneously to inflame tensions and divide communities. Enemies of the USA have been fanning the flames of white nationalism, gun rights groups, stoking anti-immigration sentiment and also the vilification of refugees and Muslims have been most visible. Yet this only scratches the outer lining.
But more subtle and vicious domestic attacks have been around in support of fringe along with other right-wing religious groups attacking women’s reproductive rights, gay marriage equality, homelessness and mental health.
There has been generational divisiveness growing between Seniors and Millennials. There's a growing demonization of environmental stewardship (see baseless attacks along with other trolling of Greta Thunberg) and attacks on democratically-held values generally.
Long-term, inter-generational damage from the exploitation of those existing divides is seen in the gutting of the US education system, diminishing access to healthcare for many, ballooning deficits that future generations is going to be saddled down by a few of the long-term consequences to become experienced this surprisingly inexpensive destabilization warfare technique.
What were once cracks within an overarching national unity are becoming red line fractures within an artificially created, cold civil war. Most are now asking the fact that was implemented to exploit these existing social divides?
Tactic 2: Leverage digital age intersection between behavioural economics, social media loopholes along with the relative ease of search results exploitation


As a digital strategist and internet-based marketer I have observed that lots of the tactics available to civilians were modified being weaponized against competing nations. Boosting social media marketing reach on divisive posts and influencers gave fringe groups the wrong sense that they held popular yet controversial views.
Social websites has a lot of loopholes that we often share to my web marketer followings for them to get more bang for their buck with clients. It’s remember this social websites platforms’ #1 goal is to keep you about the platform providing possible so they can make ad revenue. Edge in the game by showing you content believe that could keep yourself just a little bit longer. All of them are literally designed at some level to become addictive to all of us.
I discuss in my marketing content the various exploitation opportunties that trick these social platforms into thinking your articles is viral by fooling the algorithm they count on to distribute to users.
By way of example, with below $100 I can buy 10,000 twitter followers, automatically getting 1,000 retweets and favourites on 10 posts. For $100 of paid ads on twitter, you barely get any results. That’s because Twitter under-reports bot activity to be able to convince its shareholders that site engagement is growing. It’s not simply Twitter - Facebook, Instagram, Youtube (Google), Snapchat and in many cases Linkedin have the ability to exactly the same fundamental vulnerability. It is now quite simple to give false social proof to almost anything.
Humans are hardwired with cognitive biases which might be easily and often exploited by social networking platforms and check engines to produce us believe situations are more (or less) popular than they truly are. Increasingly we are most often getting stuck in our own social echo chambers and believe many people see things the same as us.
There was legitimate grievances around the US economy like job losses from globalization and artificial intelligence producing increased economic inequality. But Us residents were manipulated and sentiment hijacked by populist narratives to be the victim with the government, elites, experts, Democrats, Mexicans, Muslims, and foreign allies.
Tactic 3: Erode Trust & Global Alliances
What’s worse, not only was the goal achieved to destabilize the US by facilitating the turning of the nation on itself, but also have its internal damage bleed Anti-Americanism into US-global relations. The surprise betrayal with the American-Kurd alliance can have lasting consequences on American credibility, leaving American soldiers and civilians more vulnerable than previously.
France, the foremost and the oldest international ally of the usa, has become questioning just how much it can depend upon the US following your abrupt pulling people forces from Northern Syria without the consultations from NATO partners. As reported by the BBC,
“Russia, which sees Nato like a threat to its security, welcomes france president’s comments as “truthful words.””
It’s challenging to say when exactly this second Cold War started, one thing is for sure: we’re woefully prepared to defend ourselves from disinformation and have been taught in order to avoid difficult political conversations.

For additional information about marketing tricks take a look at this popular webpage.
Created19 Nov 2019
Web sitehttp://https://lukaszdowling.yolasite.com/
Total credit0
Recent average credit0
DNA@Home credit0 total, 0.00 average (0 tasks)
SubsetSum@Home credit0 total, 0.00 average (0 tasks)
Wildlife@Home credit0 total, 0.00 average (0 tasks)
Cross-project statsFree-DC
Founder pigeonview34
New members in last day0
Total members1 (view)
Active members0 (view)
Members with credit0 (view)