1) Message boards : Image and Video Discussion : Error ! (Message 7264)
Posted 16 Aug 2017 by tom7up
Hi

This message appears one time when I finish a mosaic and begin the next one.

- Review the last image of a mosaic
- Submit
- Error Message : Error! Unable to find an available image for project_id=5
- Reload Website
- First image of the new mosaic appears

I think this is not such a big problem.

Tom
2) Message boards : News : [wildlife] new app/type version 0.31 and an update (Message 7238)
Posted 25 Jul 2017 by tom7up
1. The deadline of Pooling-WUs is just 1-3 days. That is really too short. It should be not less than a week.

2. You add the credit for Pooling-WU to combined credit but not to Wildlife@Home credit.
3) Message boards : Number Crunching : Please optimize the algorithm for reviewing images (Message 7214)
Posted 20 Jul 2017 by tom7up
Hi Marshall

I reviewed 50 images of Lesser Snow Goose and 50 images of Common Eider and did not got an image twice. I also reviewed a lot of UAS images the last days and never got an image twice.

For me it works perfect now.

Thanks
Tom
4) Message boards : Image and Video Discussion : UAV images - bird in flight II (Message 7204)
Posted 13 Jul 2017 by tom7up
UAV images - bird in flight II

Image 491, Mosaic #65
2 White Snow Geese
1 Blue Snow Goose

I think it's a good example for species information

5) Message boards : Number Crunching : Matched Observations .. (Message 7174)
Posted 29 Jun 2017 by tom7up
Seems so.
I've reviewed 2 UAVs and now I have 2 matched observations.
6) Message boards : Number Crunching : Please optimize the algorithm for reviewing images (Message 7155)
Posted 21 Jun 2017 by tom7up
can you confirm that it's not happening in the UAV images

No. Sorry.
I never reviewed UAV images.
7) Message boards : Number Crunching : Please optimize the algorithm for reviewing images (Message 7138)
Posted 13 Jun 2017 by tom7up
Small typing error. It were 19 of 50 reviews. I counted 50 to get an example.
And yes:
The problem appears to get worse the more images you have reviewed.
8) Message boards : Number Crunching : Please optimize the algorithm for reviewing images (Message 7136)
Posted 13 Jun 2017 by tom7up
Hi.

For the last 50 pictures I got 15 times the message:
Error! You've already submitted this image. Please reload and try again.

This corresponds to 38% and happens al the time. It is really frustrating that the message comes at the end when I click on "submit". So I draw al lot of boxes for nothing. Please optimize the algorithm for reviewing images.

Now:
1. load images
2. fit the boxes
3. submit
4. check if the image already reviewed
5. error message when already reviewed

Better:
1. check if the image already reviewed
2. load only not reviewed images
3. fit the boxes
4. submit
Or
1. Load images
2. check if the image already reviewed
3.1 skip automatically if already reviewed
3.2. or show the error message and skip manually if automatically is not possible
4. …

Thanks
Tom
9) Message boards : Webpage and Application Code Discussion : message in boinc notices (Message 7041)
Posted 6 May 2017 by tom7up
Damn. Too early pleased.

I had a connection few hours ago. I got new WUs. But now the communication is gone again. I can’t upload the finished. Once more I wasted time and resources. It is sensless. I stop supporting that project till the problem ist solved.
10) Message boards : Webpage and Application Code Discussion : message in boinc notices (Message 7040)
Posted 6 May 2017 by tom7up
Hi.

It was not a XP problem. I had exact the same problems like Conen and tried the same solutions. But nothing helped.
My System work with Win7 + Boinc 7.6.33 (64). Upload of finished work was not possible. Meanwhile I got a timeout for that WUs. So I lost some work.

Last night something changed. I don’t know what, but the communication between the project and Boinc is back.

Tom
11) Message boards : Image and Video Discussion : Crow? (Message 6849)
Posted 31 Mar 2017 by tom7up
I would like to discuss the following trail cam image:
Crow?

12) Message boards : News : [climate] making a push to classify some tweets for a publication (Message 6244)
Posted 18 May 2016 by tom7up
Hi

I hope you understand my point. I write this with the rest of my school English and the help of the stupid Google Translator.

Only a handful of people are involved in this subproject. Apparently there are only 130 people with valid Tweeds and only 47 have more than 50 total tweets. Of the top ten come (estimated) 90% of the classifications. These are in any case the numbers of the top list.
This means that the classification reflects the assessment of very few people. Is that enough scientifically meaningful?

Maybe you should give credits to get more support. This could also help wildlife.
13) Message boards : Tweet Discussion : Why different validation for identical classifications? (Message 6243)
Posted 18 May 2016 by tom7up
When I review my inconclusive tweets I find some different validation for identical classifications


Examples

4052
Why are you naked? Global warming.
10 classifications with Attitude = 0, Other = unknown
Thereof 8 valid and 2 inconclusive

5551
Woohoo! RT: Pitbull libera “Global Warming: Meltdown” para streaming gratuito!
11 classifications with Attitude = 0, Other = unknown
Thereof 9 valid and 2 inconclusive

13989
I think that climate change is fairly evident with the 50 and -50 degree weather across the country
7 classifications with Attitude = 1, Impact = weather
Thereof 6 valid and 1 inconclusive

16862
Your global warming assertion is a complete LIE! Post all scientists and their credentials. THEY DONT EXIST. @bruneski
7 classifications with Attitude = -2, Phenomenon = denial
Thereof 4 valid and 3 inconclusive


The validation is not plausible to me. What's behind it?
14) Message boards : Tweet Discussion : Page not auto-reloading (Message 6237)
Posted 13 May 2016 by tom7up
Hi Steve

thanks for your quick feedback.

Validation seems to be a general problem from CSG. For other subprojects that also occurs (I just say videos). But I am a beginner and need validating as feedback for what I do.

Okay. That is not such a big problem. I can do other things till the Webpage works well and the validation runs.

Tom
15) Message boards : Tweet Discussion : Page not auto-reloading (Message 6235)
Posted 13 May 2016 by tom7up
Hi.

Same behavior. I think it is a server or profil problem.

I have 80 tweeds classified, 57 were validated. Then I got no longer new tweets automatically. It did not help to switch Browser (IE to Firefox) or Workstation. I received new tweets by reloading the page and classified 120 tweeds more in this way. But but none has been validated.

Any solution?